<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<metadata>
  <author>Public Knowledge</author>
  <description>In the Know -- a bimonthly Public Knowledge update
March 17, 2006
Contents:

* Net Neutrality Legislation Creeps Along
* Documentary Filmmakers and PK Support Orphan Works Certainty</description>
  <notes>****************************************************
 In the Know -- a bimonthly Public Knowledge update
****************************************************

March 17, 2006

Contents:

* Net Neutrality Legislation Creeps Along
* Documentary Filmmakers and PK Support Orphan Works Certainty

This issue is also available as a podcast here:
  http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/162


====================================
 Net Neutrality Legislation in Flux
====================================

Could Bill Gates himself persuade House Commerce Committee
Chairman Joe Barton (R-Tex.) to adopt strong net neutrality
principles?

In accepting an award as a "Digital Patriot" from the Consumer
Electronics Association (CEA) March 15, Barton referred to the
Net Neutrality issue by saying that he and Gates, another
honoree, had a "spirited discussion" over dinner about Net
Neutrality.  We don't know the details, but we do know Microsoft
is backing Net Neutrality.  So far, Barton and his staff have
included Net Neutrality language in draft bills but weakened it
with significant exceptions.

The latest buzz is that a draft bill could be released the week
of March 20, followed by a hearing the next week.  The House
Telecom Subcommittee, under an ambitious schedule, may try to
approve the bill that same week of March 27.

At this point, no one actually knows what will be in a draft
bill, or when we might see one.  The situation remains very
fluid.  We do know that whatever is released will be the product
of negotiations among the senior Chairman and senior Democrat of
the full Energy and Commerce Committee and the Chairman and
senior Democrat of the Telecom Subcommittee, plus Rep. Chip
Pickering (R-Miss.).  We have heard that some Net Neutrality
language may be in the draft.  The early word is that will codify
the principles the FCC set out last September when the Commission
deregulated telephone broadband services.  Those principles
called for giving consumers access to Internet content and
applications, but did nothing to curb broadband network owners
from favoring their own content and services

Pickering told the CEA conference that the negotiators are having
problems defining Net Neutrality, but they would like to make it
clear the FCC has the authority to deal with the issue.
Attaching Net Neutrality conditions to the AT&amp;T-BellSouth merger
could be a first step, Pickering said.  Pickering said that the
legislation likely will deal with video franchising, Network
Neutrality and network interconnection.

Gigi was on a panel at the CEA conference debating Net Neutrality
and content controls.  She, CEA President Gary Shapiro, Leslie
Harris of the Center for Democracy and Technology and Fred von
Lohmann from the Electronic Frontier Foundation carried the
banner for innovation and consumers against Dan Glickman, the
president of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and
David Israelite from the National Music Publishers Association.
On a separate panel, Preston Padden from the Walt Disney Co. and
entrepreneur Mark Cuban said they opposed Net Neutrality
legislation.

                Other Net Neutrality Developments

There continues to be lots of discussion of the topic in the
news.  The New Yorker, Newsweek, the Christian Science Monitor
and other publications have recently run pieces favorable to a
Net Neutrality policy.  There have been some unfavorable ones
also.  You can check out the range of articles on the Breaking
News section of our Web site.

While we're waiting for actual legislation, there were some other
developments.  The Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA),
which represents the makers of telephones and switching
equipment, issued its own "Broadband Internet Connectivity
Principles." There is much in the TIA principles with which we
agree.  Consumers should have meaningful information about their
service plans and should be able to run applications of their
choice, just to name two.

However, TIA says nothing about the possibility of a service
provider discriminating in its provision of service -- something
PK opposes.  Instead, the TIA principles appear to allow for
special deals, which they call "commercially negotiated
agreements with unaffiliated parties." Cisco Chairman John
Chambers sent a letter to the Hill last week saying he didn't
think Net Neutrality legislation was needed.

In the meantime, a letter signed by 64 companies and groups,
including PK, Microsoft, Amazon, Google and Yahoo was sent to
Barton and other members of the House Commerce Committee.  A
similar letter was also sent to leading Senators.  The March 1
letter said that "unless Congress acts, the Internet is at risk
of losing the openness that has made it an engine for phenomenal
social and economic growth."

You can read the letter from 64 companies here:
  http://static.publicknowledge.org/pdf/nn-letter-20060301.pdf

The FCC's non-binding principles are here:
  http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-151A1.doc

Our full NN report is here:
  http://www.publicknowledge.org/content/papers/pk-net-neutrality-whitep-20060206

Breaking News, with clips on NN and other features, is here:
  http://www.publicknowledge.org/news/breaking


==============================================================
 Documentary Filmmakers and PK Support Orphan Works Certainty
==============================================================

PK joined with eight filmmaker groups to endorse changes in
orphan works legislation proposed by the Copyright Office.  In a
written statement submitted to the House Subcommittee on Courts,
the Internet and Intellectual Property, we said that there are
substantial risks to small filmmakers who would like to use an
orphan work -- one whose creator can't be found -- but wouldn't
have the resources to pay the full amount of damages permitted by
copyright law should the creator some forward later.  The
Copyright Office recommended a "reasonable compensation" standard
of payment for copyright holders whose work was thought to be
orphaned.  However, that standard is still fraught with
uncertainties for artists who want to use the work, and there
would still be the threat of continued litigation over what's
"reasonable."

We suggested a statutory cap on damages that could be imposed
should the owner of an orphan work appear and that commercial
artists have the same protections as non-commercial institutions
have in being allowed the opportunity to take down or remove a
disputed work if the copyright holder objects to its use.  The
testimony was filed by the Association of Independent Video and
Filmmakers, Doculink, Film Arts Foundation, FIND (Film
Independent), the International Documentary Association,
Independent Film Project, National Alliance for Media Arts and
Culture and National Video Resources.  The testimony was prepared
by U.  of Southern California Law Professor Jennifer Urban and
her students.

You can read the testimony here:
  http://static.publicknowledge.org/pdf/ow-statement-20060315.pdf


-------------------------------------------------------------
 Please support PK: Last year was a great year for you and
 PK.  We won our broadcast flag case.  We testified before
 Congress on crucial issues like the broadcast flag and fair
 use and continue to develop excellent relationships with
 Capitol Hill.  This year, the flag, digital radio content
 controls, and closing the analog hole will be front and
 center on the content industry's agenda -- and on ours.
 We're right in the middle of the next big issue -- the
 telecom legislation that will start moving early this year.
 You can become a member here:
 http://www.publicknowledge.org/membership.  Or simply
 donate: http://www.publicknowledge.org/donate.  In either
 case, we thank you for your support.
-------------------------------------------------------------


Briefly: Congress has almost completed action on legislation (HR
683) that extends the trademark protection far beyond its
original concept.  The House passed the bill last year, the
Senate passed an amended version March 8, and now the differences
need to be worked out.  As it stands now, a company would have to
prove that the use of a trademark by someone other than the
holder somehow dilutes the value of the original.  As mentioned
in our podcast in late February, this has the potential to impact
those of us who post weblogs or photos to the web -- at least
those that mention or display a mark without specifically
commenting on it.  Ex: If you take a pic with your camera phone
while at McDonalds and upload it to flickr.com -- and you just
happen to capture the golden arches in the background, under this
bill, McDonalds could have a cause of action against you.  There
still may be time, as the bill goes to the House to receive final
passage before it goes to the President.  If you are an artist,
blogger, or anyone else who cares, contact PK and your legislator
now to tell them how you could be harmed.

The fashion industry is starting a campaign to get their design
protected by copyright -- something that has never happened
before.  The Council of Fashion Designers of America wants what
Slate magazine called "copyright-like protections" for designs.
Not all designers agree, noting that designers have traditionally
incorporated the work of others into new clothes.  See Gigi's
take on this growing controversy in the PK policy blog.

Robert McDowell, former general counsel at the Competitive
Telecommunications Assn.  appears headed for the FCC.  The Senate
Commerce Committee approved his nomination on March 16.  Also,
congratulations to former FCC Commissioner Gloria Tristani, who
becomes the president of the Benton Foundation on April 5.


Public Knowledge keeps you up to date with RSS.  We have a number
of different feeds to add to your favorite news aggregator:

  Policy Blog:
    http://www.publicknowledge.org/blogs/policy/feed

  Breaking News:
    http://www.publicknowledge.org/news/breaking/feed.rdf

  Open Access:
    http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/atom.xml

  Press Releases:
    http://www.publicknowledge.org/pressroom/releases/rssBody

  Events:
    http://www.publicknowledge.org/news/events/rssBody

To find out more about RSS and other feeds we offer, follow the
link below:
  http://www.publicknowledge.org/about/feeds</notes>
  <date_created>2006-03-16</date_created>
  <releasedate>2006-03-16</releasedate>
  <mature_content>No</mature_content>
  <is_clip>No</is_clip>
  <monochromatic>No</monochromatic>
  <collection>ourmedia</collection>
  <title>PKitK Podcast #013 2006-03-17 (enhanced)</title>
  <mediatype>video</mediatype>
  <uploader>acurtis@publicknowledge.org</uploader>
  <publicdate>2006-03-17 14:12:31</publicdate>
  <identifier>PKitK_Podcast_013_20060317_enhanced</identifier>
</metadata>
